Showing posts with label Ex- Servicemen Pension. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ex- Servicemen Pension. Show all posts

Monday, October 29, 2012

Handbook for Military Pensioners

Dear Sir,
I will request you to get it published in Report My Signals blog. It maybe useful to veterans other than Signals.
With Regards
ID Sharma
Dear ID,
My congratulations for producing the Hand Book. Pse keep doing such things to help the veterans. We have to help ourselves and we have many like you who are doing yeoman's service.
Best wishes.
Sincerely, Harbhajan Singh
Handbook for Pensioners
Handbook for Pensioers

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Hospital for ex-servicemen to come up at Manarcad

Hospital for ex-servicemen to come up at Manarcad
Staff Reporter The Hindu

Chief Minister Oommen Chandy has reiterated his government's commitment to the cause of ex-servicemen and their dependents.
Speaking at the ex-servicemen meet organised by the State Ex-Servicemen Welfare Department here on Sunday, the Chief Minister said his government would take the issues concerning war widows, dependents of servicemen who laid their lives in the service of the nation, physically challenged ex-servicemen and their dependents, in all its seriousness.
Assistance for widows
Already, the government has doubled the financial assistance to WWII veterans from Rs.500 to Rs.1,000. A new scheme of providing monthly assistance of Rs.500 to their widows has been initiated.
The Chief Minister announced that a rest house-cum-hospital complex for ex-servicemen and their dependents would be constructed at Manarcad. The government has identified 50 cents of land for the purpose and has earmarked Rs.2.5 crore for the project, he said.
The work on the rest house at Ernakulam is nearing completion and that at Malappuram would commence immediately, he said.
Aid doubled
The financial assistance to the dependents of jawans who lay their lives in war or war-like situations, has been doubled to Rs.10 lakh.
The income ceiling for availing of financial assistance has been increased from Rs.75,000 to Rs.1.5 lakh, he said.
The government is seriously thinking of introducing a new scheme which would extend financial support to those who have received bravery awards, the Chief Minister said.
The government has also decided to extend financial assistance to ex-servicemen and their dependents who undergo dialysis. Total financial assistance of Rs.10,000 at the rate of Rs.1,000 per dialysis will be provided to the eligible.
The government also provides a monthly financial assistance of Rs.200 to poor, aged ex-servicemen who are staying at old age homes.
Speaking on the occasion Thiruvanchoor Radhakrishnan, Minister for Revenue, said the interests of those who have served in the services and their dependents would be protected by the State.
Brig (Rtd) MJ Prakadan, District Panchayat President Radha V Nair and others spoke.
Hospital for ex-servicemen to come up at Manarcad

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Majors Pension Anomaly under RM's Radar!

From: Col Mohan
Date: Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:49 PM
Subject: Letter to RM on Pension anomaly- Majors & Equivalent
Please refer to my earlier mail in Apr 2011.
A copy of the letter received from Shri Antony, RM is attached for your information. I am amazed at the quick response from the RM but have little hope that he would follow it up. This is one of the may similar responses from this gentleman called Antony; and I am not inclined to take him seriously; you may be better informed about this man than I do.
Regards,
Mohan

Friday, August 27, 2010

Tax Exemption Limit to go up to Rs 2 Lakhs

Outlook India New Delhi | Aug 26, 2010
In a move that could leave more money in the hands of people, the Government today proposed to raise exemption limit on income tax from the present Rs 1.6 lakh to Rs 2 lakh.

The Cabinet approved the much-awaited Direct Taxes Code (DTC) Bill, which is likely to be tabled in Parliament during the ongoing Monsoon session and thereafter it may be referred to a select committee of members of both houses of Parliament.

The bill also seeks to remove surcharge and cesses on corporate tax, which could provide relief to business houses.

When asked what will be the limit of exemptions for income tax, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee told reporters after the Cabinet meeting that it is proposed to be raised to Rs 2 lakh from the current Rs 1.6 lakh.

"The whole objective is that a plethora of exemptions will be limited. (Income) tax slabs will be three. Rate of taxes will be taken in the schedule so that they need not be changed every year," he said.

On the corporate tax, he said it is sought to be retained at the present level of 30 per cent, but there will not be any surcharge or cesses on it.

According to sources, the DTC bill is likely to be tabled in Parliament on Monday. Thereafter, it will be referred to the select committee, they added.

When asked what the new income tax slabs would be, Mukherjee said, "that will be discussed in Parliament."

Sources, however, said income between Rs 2-5 lakh is likely to attract a rate of 10 per cent, 20 per cent for Rs 5 -10 lakh bracket and 30 per cent above Rs 10 lakh.

For senior citizens and females, the tax slabs are likely to be relaxed further, they added

When contacted, senior officials in the Finance Ministry declined to comment on the slabs.

At present, income between Rs 1.65 lakh and Rs 5 lakh attracts 10 per cent tax, while the rate is 20 per cent for the Rs 5-8 lakh bracket and 30 per cent for income above Rs 8 lakh.

The first draft of the bill had suggested 10 per cent tax on income between Rs 1.60 lakh and Rs 10 lakh, 20 per cent on income between Rs 10 and Rs 25 lakh and 30 per cent beyond that.

However, finance ministry officials had later said those slabs were just illustrative.

The Bill, approved by Cabinet today, also seeks to impose minimum alternate tax (MAT) at 20 per cent of the book profit, compared to 18 per cent at present.

The first draft had proposed to impose MAT on assets, which drew strong criticism from the industry. The MAT on book profit has been maintained in the revised draft as well.

The first draft had also proposed to tax long-term savings like provident funds at the time of withdrawal. However, the revised draft exempted them, after the first draft drew flak.

"Concerns were expressed for shifting from EEE (exempt, exempt, exempt) to EET (exempt, exempt, tax)," the Finance Minister said.

This would also address the issue of taxing surplus funds of charitable institutions, he added.

When enacted, the DTC will replace the archaic Income Tax Act and simplify the direct tax regime in the country.

Finance Ministry officials exuded confidence that the Bill will come into force by the deadline of April 1, 2011.

The code aims at reducing tax rates, but expanding the tax base by minimising exemptions.

"DTC will help in streamlining various tax exemptions, deductions and thereby bring in moderate tax rates. DTC would address most of the issues raised by corporate India, like, not imposing tax on gross assets, clarifying EEE, introducing graded deduction for capital gains among others," Ernst & Young Tax Market Leader Sudhir Kapadia said.
Tax Exemption Limit to go up to Rs 2 Lakhs

Friday, September 11, 2009

SCPC: Additional Dearness Allowance

News 24/7
Government employees to get additional five percent dearness allowance
September 10th, 2009
NEW DELHI - The dearness allowance of central government employees and pensioners has been hiked by five percent retrospectively from July 1, it was announced Thursday.

The cabinet has decided to release an additional installment of dearness allowance to central government employees and dearness relief to pensioners with effect from July 1, Information and Broadcasting Minister Ambika Soni said.

This represents an increase of five percent over the existing rate of 22 percent of the basic pay or pension to compensate for the price rise, she told reporters after a cabinet meeting presided over by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

The impact on the exchequer would be Rs.4,355.35 crore in a full year and Rs.2,903.55 crore in the financial year 2009-2010, she added.

The increase is in accordance with the accepted formula, which is based on the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission, Soni said.

The minister, however, parried a query on why the government was raising the dearness allowance in a situation where inflation was in the negative zone.

“I will answer your question later,” she said and moved on to the next item.

The government Thursday announced that India’s annual rate of inflation was minus 0.12 percent for the week ended Aug 29.
Government employees to get additional five percent dearness allowance

IESM: Invaluable selfless service rendered to widow pensioners

Dear Brig Kamboj,
The work of Gp Capt Suhas is EXTRAORDINARY. Thought you may wish to know.
With Warm Regards,
Col RP Chaturvedi (Retd)

on Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Suhas Phatak
Dear Brig Deo,
I came across your email sent to Wg Cdr Bendre about family pension and additional pension for old age in case of Mrs Pandit w/o late Air Marshal Pandit. I have been able to sort out pension of following widows/ veterans after preparing worksheet in each case and visiting their houses in the first place and later visiting their respective paying banks:
1 Ms Sushila Bhagwat -w/o Lt Col Bhagwat (AMC)-DOB: 12 Mar 1920
2 Mrs kumud Ghanekar-w/o Lt Col Ghanekar-DOB: 6 Feb 1931
3 Mrs Leela Rege-w/o lateLt Col Rege,Vr C-DOB: 18 Jan 1925
4 Mrs Thelma M Karnik-w/o late Lt Col Karnik: DOB-22 Mar 1925
5 Mrs vaishali Joshi w/o late Wg Cdr V S Joshi
6 Major KP Damle(IC-4965)DOB: 27 Nov 1919
7 Mrs Srilata Banerjee w/o late Air Cdre D Banerjee(5800)-By email
8 Mrs Anupam A Karve w/o late Cdr A N Karve(IN)
9 Mrs Sadhana P sabnis w/o late Gp capt P D Sabnis(Adm)
10 Mrs Patankar w/o late Maj Gen Patankar
11 Mrs Aruna Kodical w/o late Sqn Ldr Kodical

In addition I have been visiting most of the branches of Bank of Maharashtra, SBI, Canara Bank, Syndicate Bank at Pune city and finalising cases of retired defence officers. It is my experience that entrusting this job of paying pensioners to PDAs (Banks) was the root cause of delays. I dont blame bank staff who have no knowledge/ exposure of our intricate rules and regulations. Once your credentials are established they all have responded well and accepted my worksheets. Unfortunately some of the information is not forthcoming from our own HQ eg Length of service and whether time scale or selection grade in case of Wg Cdrs, is not mentioned in PPO and that has delayed many cases to determine their pension after they were brought under PB-4.
This is to give you the enormous task that has to be tackled. I wonder how our PBORs are being served with their legitimate pensionary benefits.
with regards,
Gp Capt SS Phatak (Retd)

Our compliments to you Gp Capt Phatak- keep up the great social service.
Chander Kamboj

Saturday, June 20, 2009

War Injury Pay and Disability Pension

12522 / VO / W I P 08 June 2009
Shri A K Antony
Raksha Mantri
Ministry of Defence
South Block
New Delhi – 110011

INJUSTICE AND DISCRIMINATION IN WAR INJURY PAY AND DISABILITY PENSION

Hon’ble Raksha Mantri,
Please accept my heartiest congratulations on the thumping victory of your party in the General Elections and your assumption of the office of Raksha Mantri once again. I am sure the serving and retired personnel of the Defence Forces will be benefited greatly under your sagacious leadership.

I am writing this letter on behalf of the entire disabled community of ex-servicemen, especially the war disabled, to bring to your notice the grave injustice that has been done to them in the matter of granting disability allowance and war injury pay. Brief details are appended in the succeeding paragraphs.

The Ministry of Defence, Department of Ex-servicemen Welfare has issued two letters relating to the implementation of the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission in respect of armed forces personnel who are disabled or become so in future, on account of wounds suffered in war or warlike situations or under other circumstances. Letter No. 16(6)/2008(1)/D (Pension/Policy) dated 04 May 2009 relates to ex-servicemen who had been invalidated out / retired from service prior to 01-01-2006. The second letter of even number dated 05 May 2009 relates to similarly categorized personnel who have or are retiring or being invalidated out after 01-01-2006. The disability allowance and the war injury pay of the two categories thus created are different. This defies any logic, especially when the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission (6CPC) do not make any such distinction.

The 6 CPC, in its recommendations had unequivocally stated that all disabled personnel of the military need to be brought up at the same level as the disabled amongst the civilian government employees, by giving them compensation for their disability as a percentage of pay, like their counterparts in the civil have been getting. This was an attempt to correct a historical wrong that has existed for a very long time. Although the 6 CPC had made no such recommendations, the military veterans have now been neatly divided into pre -01 Jan 2006 and post - 01 Jan 2006 veterans. This is a clear case of creating a divide without any justification. The upshot is that while the military veterans of post-01 Jan 2006 would at long last become at par with the civilian government employees and come under ‘a percentage of pay dispensation’, the poor ex-servicemen of earlier vintage would continue to remain ‘on a lumpsum basis’ as hithertofore. This is obviously biased and illogical.

Only one actual example should suffice to illustrate the huge difference. Sepoy Jigme of Ladakh Scouts had lost both his arms and both his eyes during the Kargil War and was granted a disability of 100%. With the new dispensation, he will receive a war injury pay of only Rs. 7,020, but a Sepoy of same length of service and same percentage of disability invalidated out after 01-01-2006 will receive Rs. 11,400 (being 60 % of total emoluments of Rs. 19,000), if he is retained in service, as is the case of this Sepoy. If a similar case occurs and the Sepoy gets invalidated immediately after his injuries, he will receive Rs. 19,000.00 (100 % of emoluments last drawn). This distortion affects all ranks - officers as well as PBOR.

The non-war disabled personnel are equally badly off. Prior to 01 Jan 2006, they were entitled to Disability Element of Rs. 2600 for officers, 1900 for JCO’s and 1550 for jawans for 100 % disability. This has been enhanced to Rs. 5880 for officers, 4300 for JCO’s and 3510 for jawans for 100 % disability. On the other hand, for those retiring after 01 Jan 2006, the disability element would be 30 % of emoluments last drawn, which amounts to higher compensation. The disparity between the two categories is similar to the war injury category.

This invidious treatment of the pre and post - 2006 disabled / war injured ex-servicemen is arbitrary and contrary to the letter and spirit of the 6 CPC recommendations. The 6 CPC, in its recommendations, had no where drawn a distinction between pre-2006 and post-2006 ex-servicemen. The dilution of the 6 CPC recommendations, restricting its application to only the post-6 CPC personnel, is inexplicable, to say the least. Had 6 CPC decided to restrict the benefit of the liberalized disability / war injury dispensation to future disabled / war injured ex-servicemen only, they would have so reflected it. It may be pointed out that the upward revision of the Constant Attendance Allowance for the 100 % disabled has also been applied equally to pre-2006 and post-2006 personnel. It is obvious that the 6 CPC has been guided by similar thinking, as it is a monetary compensation for disability and is not pension. This was also the case when the recommendations of the 5 CPC were implemented in January and May 2001.

Disparities highlighted above need to be removed so that all ex-servicemen who are disabled or war disabled receive equal compensation, on the ‘basis of percentage of pay’. The division into two categories of pre and post 2006 ex-servicemen is neither desirable nor warranted. The issue may please be favourably considered and the orders issued earlier may be suitably revised, so that the pre and post - 2006 disabled and war disabled personnel are placed at an equal footing for getting compensation for the disabilities they have incurred in both war and non-warlike situations.

Copies are being endorsed to officials dealing with the subject, for their advance information.

Thanking you.
Yours Sincerely
sd.........
(Vijay Oberoi)
Lt Gen
President War Wounded Foundation
Copy to:
Shri Vijay Singh, IAS
Defence Secretary
South Block
New Delhi - 110011
Shri S M Acharya, IAS
Secretary (ESW)
Ministry of Defence
South Block
New Delhi - 110011
Shri Sanjeeva Kumar, IAS
Joint Secretary (ESW)
South Block
New Delhi - 110011
Shri Harbans Singh
Director (Pension/Policy)
Ministry of Defence
213, A Wing, Sena Bhawan
New Delhi -110011

Saturday, January 10, 2009

Confirming Solidarity with IESM by Club-20

To: Chairman IESM

Dear Sir,
1. In continuation of our interaction with the IESM during the last few weeks, we a few members of the Club-20, who are in Delhi have planned to visit the IESM Shamiyana on Jantar Mantar Road on 11 Jan 09, at 1100 Hrs to confirm our solidarity with the IESM by garlanding the 6 veterans currently on hunger strike/fast unto death. It will infact be our honour to meet them in person and express our gratitude for holding this beacon of light so bravely.

2. Just by way of introduction, we wish to apprise your good-self that Club-20 is an informal group of retired IAF engineer officers (of DEO-20: Directly Entry Course-20, of 1962 batch) who are in the age band of 70+1 and are spread all over India, on settlement after retirement. Although the number is not very large but we keep in touch with each other through internet. It is while surfing your web/blog that we learnt details of IESM and now feel proud that we are a part of it.

3. The IES Movement is definitely a monumental stride by the IES for not only creating awareness among the retirees but also a great source of inspiration for others. it is, infact, a matter of time when the whole country will notice and appreciate it. And the GOI will recognise it.

4. With regards and good wishes for the IESM
I.Jairath
Gp Capt (Retd)
Member Club-20

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Lt Col finally in higher pay band. What does it practically mean for serving and retired officers?

Ultimately, we have just one moral duty: to reclaim large areas of peace in ourselves, more and more peace, and to reflect it towards others. And the more peace there is in us, the more peace there will be in our troubled world - Etty Hillesum

In these times of chaos, let us wish and hope for peace. A very happy new year to all readers of this blog. Now back to the topic at hand.

Impact on serving officers
There have been mixed reactions to the news confirming the placement of all Lt Colonels and equivalent in Pay Band-4 with a Grade Pay (GP) of Rs 8000. But if you ask me, there is no reason to feel dejected. We should feel happy that for the time being our Lt Cols are in PB-4 and would not be drawing a total pay package lower than Non Functional Selection Grade (NFSG) officers of Group-A civil services or Selection Grade (SG) officers of the All India Services. The Grade Pay has been tinkered with and lowered but we would keep pursuing the issue and there is nothing like a ‘full stop’ in the labyrinths of administrative strata.

Many people in the civil as well as defence set up were convinced that PB-4 was never going to come through but I’m glad that ultimately we were established in the positive and they in the red. Lt Colonels were wrongly placed equivalent to the Junior Administrative Grade (JAG) by the 6th CPC (PB-3 with GP of Rs 7600) but now have been upgraded to PB-4 with a GP of Rs 8000. The GP of Lt Cols has however been kept lower than NFSG officers of Group-A civil services / SG officers of All India Services who enjoy a GP of Rs 8700.

The upgradation would also practically mean that Lt Colonels shall now draw a higher pay band and a higher GP than the following :
  • Deputy Secretaries to Govt of India
  • Directors and Additional Secretaries to State Governments
  • District Police Chiefs (Known with variable nomenclature as District SPs / Distt SSPs / DCPs)
  • Non-Functional Selection Grade Officers of the Central Engineering Services
  • 2ICs of Central Police Organisations
  • Commandants (Junior Grade) of the Indian Coast Guard
  • Deputy Commissioners / District Magistrates / Collectors of Districts in the Junior Administrative Grade
  • Scientists ‘D’ of the Technical and Scientific Services
  • Joint Controllers of Defence Accounts (JCsDA)

    Impact on retired officers
    Retired Lt Colonels (Selection Grade as well as Time Scale) are also expected to gain from this announcement. The basic pension of pre-2006 Lt Colonels and equivalent would most probably be fixed at Rs 25700 which is higher than the basic pension of NFSG officers of the Group-A services as well as SG officers of the All India Services which is now fixed at Rs 23050. As prior to 6th CPC, the edge in pensions of Lt Cols shall hence continue to operate vis-à-vis their civilian counterparts. Most of the earlier Lt Col retirees were till now drawing a basic pension of Rs 7550 whereas NFSG/SG officers were drawing a basic pension of Rs 7150 but the 6th CPC had altered this advantage to the detriment to Lt Cols who were now granted a basic pension of Rs 17063. Thankfully this has been rectified by the GoM.
    Posted by Navdeep / Maj Navdeep Singh
    Thursday, January 1, 2009
    Lt Colonels finally in Pay Band-4. What does it practically mean for serving and retired officers?
  • Tuesday, December 16, 2008

    IESM: Vijay Diwas and Protest Rally

    On 16 Dec, the Vijay Diwas, we in Delhi and the NCR will assemble at the Amar Jawan Jyoti at 1200 hours to pay homage to the martyrs of 1971 War. We have given a paper advertisement inviting all the public to join in. After the above ceremony, we will proceed to the Jantar Mantar venue to hold a rally. This will culminate into a relay fast; 11 ESM will sit on a 24-hour open- ended relay fast. This is to press our demand for OROP that has been recently rejected by the government.

    The fast option may not find favour with some of you. It has not been easy for us either- we all have imbibed the same value system. But we have exhausted all other options, including getting arrested by the police. The Parliament is in session till 23 Dec and we wish to display our disapproval of the govt decision in a peaceful but visible manner.

    I do not suppose any ESM, or serving soldier, will disagree with the OROP demand. Those who wish to show solidarity with the cause, should please join us for the India Gate function as well as the rally. Those who cannot physically join, for whatever reason, do wish us well. I am attaching a handout that will be issued to the press on 16 Dec. This may be used for distribution to the local media.

    Best regards,
    Lt Gen (Emeritus) Raj Kadyan, PVSM, AVSM, VSM
    Chairman IESM

    An Earnest Appeal
    There are nearly 23 Lakh Ex Servicemen in India. Over 50% of them were compulsorily retired at 35-40 years of age so that the armed forces can retain their profile of fitness and youth. They were forced to go home on a meagre pension at a stage when their financial commitments were at their peak.

    Justice demands that old pensioners should get the same pension as new pensioners, irrespective of the date of their retirement. This is the basis of ‘one rank one pension’ (OROP). The Sixth Pay Commission has in fact moved in reverse. In a retrograde step, the Commission has created an unprecedented situation of ‘Many ranks one pension’. This has led to glaring intra rank as well inter rank disparities with personnel holding senior ranks getting lower pension than their juniors who retired later. See tables below:


    Every Ex Serviceman in the country unequivocally supports the demand of OROP. All serving personnel are tomorrow’s pensioners and back the demand. OROP is not a fight for money; the demand is based on justice and equity– equal pension for equal length of service and equal responsibility (rank). The OROP concept is already being followed in case of our legislators, judges and certain senior government employees. Ever since the Sixth Pay Commission report was submitted on 24 Mar 2008, the Ex Servicemen have been knocking at every possible door to get their long- standing OROP demand accepted. Unfortunately, despite promises made in the Congress election manifesto, despite the Congress President herself endorsing the demand publicly in Mohali in 2002 and despite the President including the point in his address to the Opening Session of the Parliament in 2004, the demand has been rejected in a written reply submitted by the Raksha Mantri in the Rajya Sabha on 11 Dec 2008. No reason has been given for the rejection. We once again appeal to the government to reconsider their decision and approve the OROP for defence pensioners.

    Today on Vijay Diwas we salute our martyrs who gave their life in the line of duty in the 1971 War. Let us also spare a thought for those veterans who survived the War and are now living in penury.

    Lt Gen Raj Kadyan,
    Chairman IESM
    16 Dec 2008

    Saturday, December 13, 2008

    Ex Servicemen agitated over SCPC: Building blocks

    Dear Editor,

    1. Barkha Dutt in her thought provoking article titled “Building blocks”, Hindustan Times dated 13 Dec 2008 click here has brought out a few very relevant issues regarding the future course of action in the aftermath of Mumbai Terrorist Attack. Highlighting the importance of the Defence Forces in the present scenario she says that “as a Nation we must respect our soldiers not just by sending passionate text messages to scroll under the next TV debate on the state of the army but in real ways--- in how we treat them, pay them and reward them...”

    2. The Defence Forces since the last one year have been agitated over the recommendations of the 6th CPC and have been going from pillar to post to get these glaring anomalies addressed but the Govt has turned a total deaf ear to these just and four demands. As a responsible citizen and as a veteran, I implore upon the Govt to heed to the suggestions and take immediate remedial measures to obviate any further erosion in the morale of the forces.

    (The author is a Former Senior Fellow and Security Analyst of Institute of Defence Studies and Analysis (IDSA), has been examiner PhD thesis in Defence & Security Studies, Ex Commandant Services Selection Centre & President SSB, besides being Instructor at four premier institutions of the Army. Presently he is a Vice Chairman Indian Ex Servicemen Movement).

    With Kind Regards,
    Yours Sincerely,
    Maj Gen Satbir Singh, SM (Retd)
    Dated: 13 Dec 2008
    Building blocks by columnist Barkha Dutt is Group Editor, English News, NDTV

    ESM: Latest CDA Pension goof ups

    Don’t ask me how this happened. Don’t even try to rack your brain; you’ll come to a big nought.

    Govt of India, Ministry of Defence, had issued the pension sanction letter for pre-2006 pensioners on 11 November 2008. The said Govt letter covered both PBOR as well as officers. Pension fixation tables based on old basic pension and rank were also enclosed with this letter. As we all know by now, basic pension is either to be fixed by

    Multiplying the old basic pension by 2.26 OR @ 50% of lower end of pay band + Grade Pay + MSP whichever of the two is higher.

    An annexure (Annexure-II) was also enclosed with the letter dated 11 Nov 08 which detailed the calculation based on the second option for different ranks. By way of the second option, the pension of Major Generals and Lt Generals was coming to be lower than that of Brigadiers (Rs 26150) since MSP is not admissible to Maj Gens and Lt Gens. As a result, the pension for Maj Gens and Lt Gens was also stepped up to Brig level because as per policy, senior ranks cannot be placed in lower pension grades than a junior rank. Consequently, as per Annexure-II of the letter, the pensions for the ranks of Brig, Maj Gen and Lt Gen were all placed at Rs 26150 and the same was correctly reflected in Annexure-II of the Govt letter.

    The Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions) or PCDA(P) in short, has also floated detailed guidelines to all banks across India alongwith the said Govt letter dated 11 Nov 2008 but surprisingly, the Annexure-II attached with the said letter in the PCDA(P) circular is different than the one released by the Govt. Same letter but different pension scales!

    To take an example, in Annexure-II of the Govt letter dated 11 Nov 2008, the pension of Brigs, Maj Gens and Lt Gens is mentioned as Rs 26150 after completion of 28+ years of service. However it is mentioned as Rs 26150 for Brig but Rs 24566 for Maj Gen and Lt Gen in the same Annexure-II of the same Govt letter dated 11 Nov 2008 forwarded by PCDA(P) to banks. There are many other inconsistencies too.

    You don’t believe me? Click here to have a look at this. The table on the top is the one enclosed with the actual govt letter and the table on the bottom is the table of the same govt letter floated to banks with a covering circular from the PCDA(P).

    Don’t believe me still. OK, then download the pre-2006 pensioners Govt Letter No 17(4)/2008(1)/D(Pen/Policy) Dated 11 November 2008 from the official Ministry of Defence website at click here and then download the same letter from the PCDA(P) website at click here

    Now compare the two and take a look at Annexure-II at Page 93, can you spot the difference? And again, please don’t ask me how this happened! I have no explanation whatsoever. Do not also ask me as to what happened to the direction of Govt of India vide Para 22 of the letter which ordained 'immediate' and 'expeditious' payment to pensioners. Of course all this is not deliberate, but lack of application of mind or lack of coordination, whatever, take your pick!
    Posted by Navdeep / Maj Navdeep Singh at 6:46
    Great, now CDA authorities goof up and they goof up well– they send incorrect pension tables to banks!

    Thursday, December 11, 2008

    SCPC: Calculation of Pension Arrears- Pre 1996

    Dear Friends,
    Jai Hind.
    I have received large amount of inputs from the Veterans about the amount of arrears they have received in their respective accounts. As per the analysis of these inputs done by Brig YM Narula (Signals) and me the following facts appear:

    1. SBI has assumed that additional amount due to veterans till 30 Nov 08 as arrears. (Other banks may have also probably done the same). Date of implementation of 6 CPC is 1 Sep 08. Therefore, what is due to us till Aug 08 only, should have been counted as arrears. What is due to us 01 Sep 08 onwards is current due, and should have been paid in full.

    2. Another error by SBI is that from the arrears calculated by it for period 1.1.2006 to 30.11.2008, it has wrongly deducted the amount paid as pension in last week of November 2008. Therefore, the amount which it has paid to pensioners in Dec 2008 is not correct. Those of you who are drawing pension through SBI, if you add your pension received in last week of Nov to the amount of arrears received in first week of Dec 2008, that will tally with the amount shown as your arrears due in the table below. Therefore, deduction of the amount paid in last week of November is a mistake by SBI. But before you raise this point with your bank, ask for the working of the pension and arrears in writing. Do not commit any thing to the bank till you have received the formal letter from the bank. May be we are making some wrong assumptions. As per PCDA instructions issued to all banks, the banks are supposed to send a letter to each of the pensioners dependent on them explaining the complete working of pension on 1.1.2006 and subsequent arrears.

    3. The new basic pension for Col to Lt Gen is different for period 1.1.2006 to 31.8.2008 and different 1.9.2008 onwards. This is due to the MSP being applicable only from 1.9.2008 onwards. (This is logical since serving personnel are to get MSP wef 1 Sep 08, but please note that Annex II of the 11.11.2008 does not state so. As per the Annex II the amount shown there appears to be applicable from 1.1.2006).

    4. While a Lt Gen draws more pension than a Maj Gen (or Brig) during period 1.1.2006 to 31.8.2008, from 1.9.2008 onwards Brig, Maj Gen and Lt Gen all draw the same basic pension - Rs 26,150.00. It is due to MSP being applicable from 1 Sep 08. The table for arrears prepared, based on the above mentioned inputs, is reproduced below for your information.

    In case other banks have calculated your arrears differently you can now analyse it yourself. The Table below is based on the assumption that the Veteran had earned his/her full pension (not a premature retirement). The Table is applicable to pre 1996 retirees only. The post 1996 retirees have to calculate their pension individually. The pension of post 1996 and post 2006 retirees will also differ.
    Those of you receiving NPA etc have to do the calculations separately.

    Pensioners or family pensioners above 80 years have to add the percentage as under to their basic pension and than calculate the arrears:
    From 80 years to less than 85 years 20% of revised basic pension/family pension
    From 85 years to less than 90 years 30% of revised basic pension/family pension
    From 90 years to less than 95 years 40% of revised basic pension/family pension
    From 95 years to less than 100 years 50% of revised basic pension/family pension
    100 years or more 100% of revised basic pension/family pension

    I have tried my best to make the table as simple as possible. If some of you still find it difficult to follow, kindly discuss with your friends for further clarification.

    On behalf of YOU ALL, 'i' thank Brig YM Narula, Signals, for helping us out in analysis of the inputs coming from various Veterans.

    Brig CS Kamboj VSM (Retd)

    Wednesday, November 19, 2008

    SCPC: Pension Order a new dispensation in reverse gear

    One-Rank-One-Pension put in the Reverse Gear! WAR VETERANS BETRAYED

    A good wage structure does not necessarily entail high salaries. It aims at equity and justice. Be it affluence or poverty, it must be distributed with prudence and sagacity.

    A Trust Belied
    It is appropriately said that the ‘politicians are a law unto themselves’. Promises made during the election rallies are like writings on shifting sand dunes; they are gone with the wind, the moment the votes have been cast. The ex-servicemen have just discovered this home truth with chagrin and dismay. The Chairperson of the current ruling alliance had personally endorsed one-rank-one-pension (OROP) format as a reasonable demand. Seen in that light, the letter issued by the Department of ESM Welfare on 11th Nov 2008 has come as a rude shock. The dispensation granted through this letter is eminently inferior to the pension structure granted by the Fourth as well as the Fifth Pay Commission. The OROP model has received a body blow. The very manner in which the above official communication was delivered to the Service Headquarters smacks of villainy. The captioned document, which affects more than two million veterans was unceremoniously handed over to the Pay Cells on the afternoon of Friday the 14th November a few minutes before the staff was packing up for the week end, three days after it had been signed. It was not considered prudent to communicate its contents to the press, because it was very well known that there is little in it to cheer the old soldiers or bring a smile on their wrinkled faces. We are told that the aforesaid Department was created to protect the veterans’ interests. The irony is that it is manned almost entirely by civilians and has “welfare” in its title. All that it has so far achieved is to create a few additional posts for civil servants, and issue obnoxious letters of the type mentioned above!

    Let the Figures Tell the Tale
    Government orders regulating the pensions of soldiers retiring after 1.1.2006 were issued a day later, and therefore, it is now possible to compare the quantum of pension sanctioned to pensioners of different vintages. A table which shows the comparative figures at a few representative ranks is given below. It is evident that the past pensioners have been given a raw deal in all cases except a handful of apex grade officers. Please note that this table assumes that the soldier retired after rendering the service prescribed by his terms of engagement and had reached the top of his scale. In case of the PBOR, combat category in the Y group has been chosen since it represents the largest population of soldiers. All the figures are the revised basic pension as on 1.1.2006.

    Pre-1996/ 1996 to 2005/ Post 1.1.2006
    Sepoy (19 yrs service): 3764/ 4667/ 6500
    Hav (24 yrs service): 5008/ 5239/ 7845
    Sub (28 yrs service): 9323/ 10532/ 10795
    Lt Col (top of scale): 17,063/ 21,131/ 25,310
    Col (top of scale): 26,050/ 26,050/ 30,375
    Lt Gen (top of scale): 26,150/ 27,685/ 38190
    Army Commander: 40,000/ 40,000/ 40,000

    The Transition into the Revised Pension Paradigm
    For the benefit of those who have not been able to comprehend the jargon in the paper and the maze of figures in the tables, the process of determining the revised pension is given below in a simplified form. With the exception of officers of the rank of Col, Brig and Maj Gen, the revised pension admissible to the pre-2006 retirees is derived simply by multiplying the Basic Pension (ie, without adding the 50% Dearness Pay merged on 1.4.2004) admissible before 1.4.2004 by a factor of 2.26. For those who retired after 1.4.2004, the multiplicand is 1.5067. This rule also applies to Lt Gens who retired after 1997 with a Basic Pay greater than Rs 23,450. All Cols have been granted Rs 26050 and all Brigs, Maj Gens and Lt Gens other than those whose Basic Pay was in excess of Rs 23,450 have been granted a uniform revised pension of Rs 26,150. It can be seen that this government order is a great leveler. It makes no distinction between the high and the low! Commuted portion of the pension (if any) will be deducted from the revised pension until the end of fifteen years from the date of retirement. In addition to the Basic Pension determined in the above manner, Dearness Relief (DR) will be admitted at the following rates. The rates of the existing DR already admitted on the Pensions will be adjusted while calculating the arrears. And these figures are given alongside for ready reference

    New DR/ Old DR
    1.1.2006: 0%/ 24%
    1.7.2006: 2%/ 29%
    1.1.2007: 6%/ 35%
    1.7.2007: 9%/ 41%
    1.1.2008: 12%/ 47%
    1.7.2008: 16%/ 47%

    Observations and Comments
    The executive orders for the civilian pre-2006 pensioners were issued about a month ago. As such the orders for the military were long overdue. Consequently, it was widely believed that the major aspirations of the veterans would be met. But this dispensation falls well short of our minimum expectations. A preliminary review reveals the following defects:
  • OROP is a 25 year old demand. The Congress party has supported it all along. It was also a part of their election manifesto. We find that there is a very wide gap between the past pensions and the present ones. This is likely to arouse strong passions. It may also be mentioned that at the apex ranks (Chief and Army Cdrs) it is virtual OROP, and that may raise hackles amongst those who have been given a raw deal.
  • MSP Military Service Pay counts for pension. It will, therefore, raise the pensions of he post 2006 retirees. However in respect of the past pensioners, it has been engineered in such a manner that it is effective in a very selective and restricted manner. Neither for the PBOR nor for the junior officers does it make a substantial difference in the pension package. This is another issue which can cause bitterness.
  • Inter-se Relativities. Soldiers view their emoluments in relation with their peers and immediate seniors or juniors. In the instant case, the relativities have been disturbed so badly that the picture emerging at the end of the exercise is grotesque. There is a wide gap between the pensions of Lt Col and Col and the pension granted to four ranks from unit commanders to corps commanders is the same. Again there is a wide gap between the pension of Lt Gen and Army Commander. The structure fouls with the ethos of the military.
  • Aggregate benefit. The present perception is that there is a wide difference in the aggregate gain accruing to soldiers at different levels. Whereas at some levels, the ratio improvement is as high as three, in the case of the PBOR it is as low as 2.26. Further, since the revised DA formula is less liberal, the inflation neutralization is relatively lesser in magnitude. Those who have a head for figures would have observed that the index as per the old rates moved up from 124 in Jan 2006 to 147 on 1.1.2008 signifying an increase of 18.5%. During the same period, DA at the new rates moved up by 12% only. As a cumulative result of all these factors, the older veterans will have to tighten their belts and compromise on their nutrition standards and education of their children. And of course, consumer frills and thrills will have to be cut out completely.

    Concluding Remarks
    As one looks at the work done by the various Pay Commissions, it is observed that each of the previous three Pay Panels moved us closer to the OROP regime. The Fifth Pay Commission brought us down to just two categories, pre-1996 and post-96 pensioner. They introduced the concept of modified parity, through which the past pensioners were granted pensions equal to the minimum given to the future retirees. The current order puts this process in the reverse gear, and takes us farther from the OROP paradigm.

    We are, indeed, very well aware of the very large population of military pensioners and conscious of the strain caused to the national exchequer by our increasing longevity. A viable long term solution was mooted by the Army as early as 1985; to reduce the number of pensioners through lateral shift of soldiers to the para-military forces. The Sixth Pay Commission has devoted a whole chapter, number 2.4, to this subject but as far as we can see, this very cogent suggestion has been put on the back burner by our dim-witted civil servants, mainly because of their lack of ability to comprehend the benefits and the mechanics of this administrative reform. It smacks of their lack of commitment to the armed forces.

    Recommendation
    I am tempted to offer a piece of unsolicited advice to the powers that be. To assuage the wide spread anguish created by the revised pensions granted by the government, I think there is a crying need to examine all aspects related with the problems of ex-servicemen. The imperatives for rejecting the OROP demand must be explained to the ex-servicemen and the genuine grievances of the veterans must be addressed with evident sincerity. The problem of re-settlement is far more acute and heartrending than inadequacy of pensions. The Sixth Pay Commission devoted a whole chapter, number 2.4, to this issue. If there are cogent reasons to put this issue on the back burner, we the people of India need to be educated on the subject. Many of us attribute the inaction on the part of the government to plain inefficiency and callous indifference to the plight of soldiers.

    Acknowledgements
    I am grateful to HE Lt Gen MM Lakhera, PVSM AVSM VSM the Hon’ble Governor of MIZORAM for motivating me to undertake this research and my lifelong friends, Lt Gen Raj Kadyan and Wg Cdr J Thomas, for some valuable inputs.

    Maj Gen Surjit Singh (Retd)

    Maj Gen (Retd) Surjit Singh, AVSM VSM FNAE has been associated with three Pay Commissions and has published a book “Wages Down the Ages". We once again thank General Surjit Singh for patiently deciphering the ESM pension pay orders. He has given our fraternity a lucid and crystal clear analysis of "One Rank one Pension" which has been effectively put in reverse gear by the SCPC. SCPC has betrayed the War Veterans and certainly as the nation grapples with the economic down slide, veterans need to tighten the buckle to greater degree than the rest of its citizens. The cheer, smiles and anticipation of veterans and widows reduced to despair and gloom!
  • Saturday, November 15, 2008

    SCPC: Revised Pension for the Armed Forces

    Dear Friends,
    Jai Hind.
    Vide Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare, New Delhi- 110011, letter No No 17(4)/2008(1)/D(Pen/Policy), dated 11-11-2008 addressed to the three Services Chiefs, the Government decision on the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission– Revision of Pension of Pre 2006 Armed Forces Pensioners/ Family Pensioners has been issued.

    Kind courtesy Cdr KK Punchhi, I have received a copy of the letter. The letter is a PDF file of 95 pages (484 KB) is given as link below. I also reproduce below an email received from Lt Gen Kadyan, which will help you calculate your pension as on date.

    Dear colleagues,
    The pension notification for all of us has been issued a short while ago. The known details for pre 2006 pensioners as of now are:
    New pension= Your old pension x 2.26 + Rs 3,000.00 + 16% DA on the total.
    The only concession given to defence personnel is that they have been given notional advantage of the MSP for all ranks, including Maj Gen & Lt Gen. That is how Rs 3000 gets added because that is half of MSP. For PBOR it would be an addition of Rs 1,000. More details would follow as these emerge.

    Best regards,
    Lt Gen Raj Kadyan, PVSM, AVSM, VSM (Retd)
    Chairman IESM

    Based on the email from Lt Gen Raj Kadyan, I have also prepared a table for pension of the officers, which is reproduced below for your perusal. I will also work out the year wise table of arrears and forward the same to you as soon as possible.
    TABLE OF PENSION OFFICERS
    Those of you receiving different amount of pension than mentioned in the table above, should use the formula given by Gen Kadyan in his email above.

    For PBORs: I am sorry I do not have the data for the pension as on 1-1-1996. I will try and get the data if possible and work out the table of pension for PBOR as on date.

    On behalf of YOU ALL, "i" thank Lt Gen Raj Kadyan and Cdr KK Punchhi for sending the information to us.

    In Service of Indian Military Veterans,
    Brig CS Kamboj VSM (Retd)

    The government has decided to grant the benefit of MSP to past retirees also which is a welcome step. But my advisory of ‘take it with a pinch of salt’ has also come into play. The addition of an MSP fitment into pension does not translate into direct benefit to all retirees since the benefit of 50% of MSP (Rs 3000 for Officers and Rs 1000 for PBOR) has not been granted for calculation of new pension as per the new 6th CPC system but only for the purposes of prescribed minima for each rank. Meaning thereby that the new pension for old retirees shall not be below 50% of the minimum of new pay band plus grade pay plus MSP (plus x group pay if admissible). Hence the new pension shall be either:
  • As per the new fitment scheme of the 6th CPC (that is, old basic pension x 2.26 + 16% DA as on date) or
  • @ 50% of minimum of new scale + x Group Pay if admissible + Grade Pay + MSP
    whichever of the two is higher.

    Example:
    Pension of a Full Colonel who retired on any date prior to 1-1-2006 would be granted @ 50% of minimum of new scale (Rs 37400) plus Grade Pay (Rs 8700) plus MSP (Rs 6000) which would come to 50% of Rs 52100, that is Rs 26050 (plus the applicable DA of course). The said pension would also be admissible to Lt Colonels who retired prior to 1-1-2006 in case Pay Band-4 is accepted for Lt Colonels.

    An across the board fitment @50% of MSP for all retirees has not yet been granted.

    This paragraph from Govt of India Letter No 17(4)/2008(1)/D(Pen/Policy) dated 11 Nov 2008 may throw more light on the issue:
    “The consolidation of pension will further be subject to the provision that the consolidated pension, in no case shall be lower than fifty percent of the minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre revised scale from which the pensioner had retired/discharged including Military Service Pay and ‘X’ Group pay where applicable. For example, if a pensioner had retired in the pre-revised scale of pay of 6600 – 170 – 9320, the corresponding pay band being 9300 - 34800 and the corresponding grade pay and Military Service Pay being Rs. 4,600/- and Rs. 2,000/- respectively, his minimum guaranteed pension would be 50% of Rs 9300 + Rs 4600 + Rs 2000 i.e. Rs 7,950....”

    Maj Navdeep Singh TA
    Better news for pre 1-1-2006 (and pre 1-9-2008) pensioners in the offing : MSP fitment may be granted to all retirees

    Dear Friends,
    The official communication regarding pension has been received. While I am still trying to analyze the maze of figures, I have just one word to describe this dispensation: it is grotesque.
    Our 'movement' has been given a short shrift, and the sensibilities of the past pensioners have received a severe blow. However, as a die hard optimist, I am sanguine that something will be done to remedy the situation.

    With best wishes.
    Maj Gen Surjit Singh (Retd)
    PS: Those who are in a hurry may just turn to Annexure II and Table 2 on page 92-93.

    Please click link for the 95 pages of pension tables. Give it an extra few seconds for the 450kb pdf file to load. Bingo you have the pension literally scratched on the moon surface for grabs!
    Implementation of government decision on the recommendations of SCPC- Revision of Pension Pre 2006 Armed Forces Pensioners/ Family Pensioners.
    Alternate CGDA link:
    Pension Orders Pre 2006
    SCPC: Post 2006 Pension Scales
  • Saturday, September 20, 2008

    Helping ESM


    We feel happy in helping War Widows & ESM get their Pension dues:

  • Smt Surjit Kaur (70) wd/o late Sep Shingara Singh of the Sikh LI, r/o Vill Pir Sohana PO Packi Rurkee (Kharar) Mohali, has got Special Family Pension after 46 Years. Shingara Singh was killed in action during Indo- china war on 21/11/62. He had joined the Army on 4/1/58. Surjit Kaur was granted Normal Family Pension @ Rs 62/-pm only (gradually increased to Rs 2813/-), being illiterate from remote area. She realized after few years that she was getting less Fam Pen compared to others. She kept running here & there but never succeeded. We started processing her case from last 18 months with DPDOs Ropar & Chandigarh and with higher authorities. Few hurdles were cleared & she has now got her full special Family Pension @ Rs 5313/-pm, along with 46 year’s arrears lump sum Rs 3,80,000/- or so. We earned her blessings. She may live longer with dignity.
  • Smt Rajinder Kaur (80) wd/o late Nk Channan Singh, of BEG Pune, r/o Vill Rattangarh Simble PO Kurali (Ropar) have got her Family Pension after 5 years struggle. Her husband Nk Chanan Singh (pensioner) expired on 20/5/03. They had shifted from Ferozpur DPDO to Ropar DPDO, hence both DPDOs kept playing with her age & illiteracy. We took up her case 2 yrs back & found that DPDO Ferozpur (Mr Sehgal) was playing mischief & sending wrong reports & incomplete papers. Operation all out was launched (from under the CSD tree) trough higher HQrs/ MOD & Director Sainik Welfare Pb. Finally, she got her Family Pension release orders dt 27/5/08. She is now getting her pension and arrears credited as lump sum. She is a bed ridden old lady, also sends her blessings & sweets to NGO.
  • Nk Manjit Singh (of CMP Bangalore), r/o Vill Behlolepur (Chamkaur Sahib) Ropar. He joined Army on 17/1/97 and was released from service on medical grounds after 10 yrs 6 months, on 21/6/07, due to generalized seizure. He was not released any type of Pensions. We took up his case last year and have succeeded in convincing higher authorities to release his Service & Disability Pension elements total @ Rs 5900/-pm, on 18/6/08, along with arrears lump sum of Rs 4,72000/- wef 22/6/07. He & his family feel mentally satisfied & happy.
  • Smt Palwinder Kaur of Vill Tarkheri (Fatehgarh Sahib). Her husband Sep Balbir Singh of Sikh LI was missing since last 18 years. He had completed 12 years of service in Army & was on annual leave. He disappeared all of sudden wef 10/10/2000, at end of leave/ returning to unit. All out efforts were made to trace him out but in vein. Palwinder Kaur’s source of income dried down & she has been bringing up family with parent’s help & menial jobs. She tried for family pension, but w/o success. This NGO took up her case last year & she has been released some amount of Army Group Insurance Rs 15000/- amount on 27/6/08. We are hopeful that MOD/ Army will also release her family pension & other dues soon. All the documentation have been completed.

    2. It is very encouraging for us that, we have gainfully helped our ESM community. We thank GOD and higher authorities of Army & CDAs for their kind support.

    Lt Col SS Sohi (Retd)
    Ex-Servicemen Grievances Cell (Regd)

    We congratulate Lt Col SS Sohi for the yeoman services being rendered for the welfare of ESM and their families.
  • Friday, September 19, 2008

    PM means well for the ESM: Tardy follow up action by Bureaucrats

    PM Inaugurates Meeting of Kendriya Sainik Board May 19, 2007

    The welfare and well being of our soldiers, ex-servicemen, widows and their dependents have always been a subject very close to my heart.

    Indeed, the subject of ex-servicemen’s welfare has in fact been identified by me as a thrust area of the Government’s functioning and my Office is monitoring it regularly and very closely.

    I believe that the most befitting tribute we can pay to the exemplary sacrifices that our valiant soldiers have made for the nation, is for us to look after them in the best possible manner after they retire.

    I am happy about recent initiatives taken by the Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare to strengthen the mechanism for prompt redressal of the grievances of Defence pensioners. These include computerization of the pension sanctioning offices and organizing regular Defence Pension Adalats in different parts of the country. In this context, I believe we need to intensify efforts to ensure that the targets set for Pension Adalats are met.

    It is a matter of satisfaction that following our decision taken last year, with effect from 01.01.2006, the pensionary benefits of Personnel Below Officer Rank have improved significantly. This, I believe, has benefited about 12 lakh pensioners.

    I take this opportunity to also seek your help for the families of the serving soldiers posted in far-flung locations. As the soldiers are posted far from home, it is difficult for them to attend to the needs of their families, and to deal with property related matters and other personal issues. To assist them we need a mechanism by which at the District level, the Collector, and at the State level a nominated senior officer can every quarter review the status of grievance redressals. Such grievance redressal meetings for the benefit of ex-servicemen can be organised in conjunction with the Sainik Boards in States on the lines of Pension Adalats.

    State Governments could also consider introducing e-enabled services for dissemination of relevant information and guidance for the benefit of Ex-servicemen through dedicated web sites.

    Last year I announced a scheme to provide scholarships for the children of ex-servicemen to pursue professional education in management studies, engineering, medicine and a variety of other disciplines. The scheme is being funded from the National Defence Fund and I believe that there is no better way to repay the debt we owe to our ex-servicemen than to provide for the education of their children. I am very happy that in the very first year of the scheme itself we have awarded scholarships to 3,915 meritorious students from the families of our ex-servicemen and paramilitary forces. This is a small recognition of the great contribution that our armed forces make to the protection of our liberties, to the strengthening of our vital borders and promotion of our vital national interests.

    The Kendriya Sainik Board is an apex body which makes recommendations towards formulating policies for the welfare of ex-servicemen, war widows, disabled soldiers and their families. The various agencies of the Government, which deal with these matters, will give careful consideration to these recommendations.

    I thank Hon’ble Raksha Mantriji for inviting me to this very important event and I hope that many useful suggestions and initiatives for the welfare of our soldiers and their families will emerge from this meeting. I wish you all the success in your endeavours.”
    PM Inaugurates Meeting of Kendriya Sainik Board May 19, 2007

    Kendriya Sainik Board: ESM Identity Cards

    1. The Identity Card to the retiring Defence Services personnel is issued by concerned ZSB where the retiring Defence personnel proposes to settle down after retirement as recorded in his discharge document(s). For this purpose, all retiring Defence personnel are required to get their particulars filled in the registration form in duplicate at the Record Office at the time of their discharge. One copy of the registration form is forwarded by the Record Office to the concerned ZSB by post and the second copy by hand through the retiree himself. Thereafter, the individual is required to call on the concerned ZSB along with three copies of the stamp size photographs, discharge certificate/PPO and other relevant service documents for issue of I-Card. At the ZSB, the particulars are scrutinised and in case the individual qualifies to the status of ex-Servicemen, he will be asked to fill in an application form and I-Card will be issued to him. Formats for applying for registration by ex-Servicemen and Widows with their respective RSB/ZSBs and issue of Ex-Serviceman/Widow Identity Card are given at Appendix F.

    2. Please remember, I-Card is a pre-requisite for availing the benefits of the welfare schemes instituted under the "Armed Forces Flag Day Fund" vide Government of India SRO 7E dated 13 Apr 1993.

    APPENDIX 'F'(Refers Para 1 of Chapter 3) REGISTRATION FORM EX-SERVICEMEN
    1 Number
    2. Rank
    3. Regt/Corps
    4 Name
    5. Father's Name
    6 Educational Qualification :Civil Service
    7 Decoration
    8. Character
    9 Address
    10 Religion
    11. Caste
    12 Details of family (wife only dependent children upto 25 years and dependent parents)
    Name
    Age
    Relationship
    Educational Qualifications
    (i)
    (ii)
    (iii)
    13. Date of Birth
    14. Date of Enrollment
    15. Date of Discharge
    16.Reason for Discharge
    17 Amount of Pension
    (a) Service Pension Rs.
    (b) Disability Pension Rs.
    (c) % age of Disability
    18. Lump sum payment received :
    (a) Gratuity Rs.
    (b) Group Insurance Rs.
    (c) Leave encashment Rs .
    (d) Financial Assistance Rs.
    19. Commuted Pension Rs.
    20. Discharge Book No. and Date
    21 PPO NO. and Date
    22 Present occupation & monthly income
    Service Rs.
    Business/Industry
    Agriculture Rs.
    Un-employed
    23. Other relevant information, if any
    24. Identification Marks
    26. Left Thumb Impression
    DECLARATION
    I hereby declare that the particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
    Date :
    Place :
    (Signature of the Applicant)

    FOR OFFICIAL USE
    Status as ex-Servicemen Yes/ No
    No.& Date of Identity Card Issued
    Date :
    Place :
    (Signature of Zila Sainik Kalyan Officer/Sec.,ZSB with office stamp & date)
    PROCEDURE FOR ISSUE OF IDENTITY-CARD TO RETIRING DEFENCE SERVICES PERSONNEL

    Comment: One wonders how many retired Officers are in possession of the Indentity card issued by KSB. The application form itself is bureaucratic in nature. Are filling these forms relevant in the digital and networking age? As a Nation are we going forward or backward?
    Photo: TOE Foundation

    Thursday, April 10, 2008

    Vox Populi Appeal to Commander- in- Chief

    Dear Madam President,

    As Commander-in-Chief of the Defence Forces, you would be greatly concerned about the decline in their morale, particularly in the lower ranks (PBOR- personnel below officer rank) and middle level officer ranks upto Colonel (and equivalent). They are the backbone of the Defence Forces and bear the brunt of the worst conditions.

    The recent 6th CPC has ignored the case placed before it by the Services HQ to undo and alleviate the many years of financial hardship suffered by the Armed Forces, particularly that endured by the PBOR and junior and middle level officers upto the rank of Colonel (and equivalent).

    The CPC recommendations in its Report has many anomalies and is a total ‘muddle' as far as the Defence Forces are concerned. They applied a ‘management approach’ rather than a ’leadership approach’ in their thinking because of a reliance on members with a management background, but no ‘leadership’ experience. The members of the CPC did not know even the basics of how to lead men and women into battle in the most fearful and hazardous conditions and to even lay down their lives.

    The haemorrhage of middle level officers through chosen premature retirement and the disincentive that this provides for entry of the best candidates in to the Officer training academies will lead to a rapid further decline in military morale, leadership, efficiency and fighting capability.

    As Head of State this will cause you much concern and I trust that you will direct your PM and Government to reconsider the representation by the Service Chiefs, more thoughtfully.

    Yours faithfully

    Col Maurice Abel (Retd)

    Comments: The Service Chiefs are under immense and intense pressure of the Government to toe the official line. The bureaucracy exploits the individual weaknesses of Higher Command of the Defence Forces. RM personal intervention alone will yield results. The present ratio of highest paid to lowest (COAS: PBOR) is almost 10:1, this ratio needs to be prudently tailored to 5:1, else the morale of troops will continue to deteriorate.

    Sunday, February 3, 2008

    Embracing Frugality

    With inflation and sticky stock markets, we as pensioners have reason to be overwhelmed. We may feel at times there is nothing we can do to prevent our own house from crumbling financially. Can we do something to start shoring up our financial house, which is equally true whether one is reaping the benefits of plenty or facing economic downslide?
    Now, maybe is the time to embrace frugality. We have truly sought to live out and embrace the 5 star culture of yesteryears especially while in service, but need of the hour is to control our rash rationality.
    We are dreamers and surely all are looking out for the Sixth Pay Commission handouts, which will enhance our spending capability but till then, we must condition ourselves to spending less and be contented. This must be everyone's personal mantra to advocate and practise. Embrace fiscal fast an as alternate therapy.

    Moderator

    Disclaimer

    The contents posted on these Blogs are personal reflections of the Bloggers and do not reflect the views of the "Report My Signal- Blog" Team.
    Neither the "Report my Signal -Blogs" nor the individual authors of any material on these Blogs accept responsibility for any loss or damage caused (including through negligence), which anyone may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of use of or reliance on information contained in or accessed through these Blogs.
    This is not an official Blog site. This forum is run by team of ex- Corps of Signals, Indian Army, Veterans for social networking of Indian Defence Veterans. It is not affiliated to or officially recognized by the MoD or the AHQ, Director General of Signals or Government/ State.
    The Report My Signal Forum will endeavor to edit/ delete any material which is considered offensive, undesirable and or impinging on national security. The Blog Team is very conscious of potentially questionable content. However, where a content is posted and between posting and removal from the blog in such cases, the act does not reflect either the condoning or endorsing of said material by the Team.
    Blog Moderator: Lt Col James Kanagaraj (Retd)

    Resources