Saturday, May 31, 2008

Indo- China War 1962


Tawang Monastery

Inaccurate Maps
Suddenly our role was changed from defence of Tawang, the Divisional Vital Ground, to evict the Chinese from DHOLA post. Moves on the chessboard started. Planting of small flags on maps in the Operations Rooms of various HQ had commenced. Unfortunately most of the maps were sketchy and at best inaccurate. Incredibly the whole of the operation of river Namka Chu involving 7 Bde was planned on a sketch prepared by an Assam Rifles jawan. This was the best available at all levels from Brigade to Army HQ. It was inaccurate, not to scale and was supplied to all and sundry in the form of a blueprint. Even I was de- briefed on the same on my return from the debacle by the Director Military Intelligence and the Director Signals.

No Border Maps
A word about the state of maps of the area of Op Leghorn and why the Assam Rifle sketch became so important and indispensable. I quote from a letter, dated 24 Sep 2001, from my elder brother Shri Ratna Singh.
Quote.- It was about October, at this time, I was a supervisory officer in Survey of India at Dehradun and we were working round the clock in connection with the up dating of our Northern Border maps using Aerial Photography and photogrammetric techniques. It is interesting to, note that till then our border maps were sketchy and could not be relied upon. -Unquote.

Communications
9 Punjab was ordered to move from Tawang and contact Dhola post. CO Lt Col Mishra in the process deployed his battalion along the Namka Chu River line. To my ill luck, he never took the Signals detachment with him and left the 62 Set and the operators at his base at Lumpu with his 2IC Major Dilbagh Singh. He had his own set working back to the base at Lumpu. He must have had his own reasons for this unconventional action. However, my problems and brickbats from higher HQ had already started, who were not interested in Mishra's reasons, they were more worried as to why information was not coming through signal channels.

Delay in passage of messages
The extremely long distances over which communications were required, all the way from Army HQ at Delhi to Dhola, on the Tri- junction of India China and Bhutan had its own problems. Engineered on different and mostly mismatched equipment, vagaries of atmospherics and the physics of ionosphere, the system was far from robust with little redundancy. Holdings and use of multiple cryptographic systems, Linex, Book and Machine at various levels from Battalions, Brigade, Division to Army HQ added their own share to the bottlenecks and delays at various levels in the passage of the messages.

Mobile communication
Split HQs, Commanders and Staff mostly away from their HQs, Signals uprooted time and again and mostly on move, it was a wonder that Communications did exist, if at all. Delays had to happen in the passage of messages. No doubt I had to bear the brunt, even though both my CO Lt Col Tewari and the Commander Brig Dalvi shielded me. However, Priority messages pending in the signal centre or on the wireless links, the only means of clearing traffic, did create their own share of stress in me, as would have been the case with any other signal officer.

Delay of Top Secret Messages
Senior Signals Officers had also to share the burden of pressures from top. Brig Dalvi has recorded in his book about the delay in a Top Secret message from Gen Kaul originated from 1/9 GR location, from where there was no provision or facility to clear such messages. The Signal elements of the Brigade including me were all this time on move, the Brigade had neither a functioning HQ nor any signal communication system.

Brigadier Dalvi writes
quote- A sturdy Sikh from the Punjabis would be detailed to 'run' with the vital message to Lumpu. From there, the second- in–command of the Punjabis would phone it through to Ziminthaung (A Top Secret message on an open line, to which a Chinese agent possibly could have te-ed in his telephone for transmission to Peking even before it reached Delhi.) where it would be enciphered and transmitted to Tezpur, Delhi and Lucknow. The first message reached Delhi after three days. Mr Menon was extremely annoyed and demanding the dismissal of the Chief Signal Officer of Eastern Command for inefficiency.-unquote

Brig Lakshman Singh (Retd)

Tawang was returned to the control of India. The valiant last stand of Mahavir Chakra awardee Jaswant Singh Rawat took place in Tawang. After the voluntary withdrawal of Chinese troops, Tawang was once again under Indian administration. In recent years, China has occasionally voiced its claims on Arunachal Pradesh, especially Tawang, and Chinese troop incursions continue to occur frequently. According to news reports, the state government was willing to swap territories with China in order to make border adjustments, but it firmly refused to lose out any major towns or monasteries to China. Today, Tawang serves as a center for tourist attractions, thanks to the preserved beauty of the Tawang monastery.

Friday, May 30, 2008

Is RTI Citizen Friendly or Regressive as OSA?

This refers to the column On the Right to Know in the NIE of 26 May 2008.

The RTI Act, 2005 is no doubt the best legislation post 15 Aug 1947. It is also the only legislation that recognises the fundamental principle of a working democracy- the empowering of people through informed decision making. No doubt the Act is not perfect and these have been taken up with the concerned authorities- right up to the President of India- on many occasions. They are yet to be acted upon.

Unfortunately, the government after enacting a fairly powerful, simple, straightforward law entrusted its implementation to people who should have been presumed vested interests in subverting it. Events of the last 32 months of operation of this Act has proved the fears of activists in this field to be true.

To begin with, the bureaucrats who have been appointed as Chief Information Commissioners at the Centre and in most of the states have more than amply demonstrated their lack of commitment in implementing the Act by not using the deterrent clauses of the Act to impose punishments on the delinquent public authorities. Worse, they have gone overboard to substantially subvert the provisions of the Act by themselves holding that information sought in the form of questions need not be provided! The judiciary has also played spoil sport by increasing the cost of application exorbitantly (the Delhi High Court had made it Rs 500/- against Rs 10/- by the Centre and most of the states!) and also introducing fee for the first appeal when the first appeal has itself been provided as an opportunity for a senior official of the public authority to correct any mistakes committed by its public information officer who is generally a lower level official. The incompetence of the information commissioners have compounded the problem in the case of the courts wherein the Central Information Commission had itself passed an order that judicial proceedings will be out of purview of the RTI Act. (Please see the report 'Information Act will not apply to judicial proceedings: Commission' in the NIE of 27 Sep 2007.)

Right from the beginning all proceedings in our courts are supposed to be in 'open courts', except in the case of certain sensitive cases which are held 'in camera'. A provision to protect such 'in camera' proceedings from inquisitive eyes is being misinterpreted to keep the judiciary itself from the purview of the first pro-democracy Act. And now the CJI goes overboard and declares that his office itself is beyond the purview of the Act! Instead of the Central Information Commission setting up a full bench to decide if the CJI's stand is legal or not, the real need is for the law makers to proceed with impeachment of the CJI for proven incompetence! Sec 2(h) of the RTI Act which defines a public authority leaves no room for doubt that the office of the CJI is a public authority and since it does not figure in the list of public authorities specified in the second schedule of the Act who are kept out of its purview there is no need for wrecking one's brain too much to decide if the CJI is true or not. Yes, one may tickle one's brain to decide if it is purely a matter of incompetence of the CJI or a calculated move to keep his office out of public scrutiny because his office has things which needs to be hidden from public scrutiny!

Maj PM Ravindran (Retd)
CIC to decide if CJI under RTI Act
With unfriendly ex-babus in charge, info a pipedream
Income Tax investigation out of Right to Information

Disclaimer

The contents posted on these Blogs are personal reflections of the Bloggers and do not reflect the views of the "Report My Signal- Blog" Team.
Neither the "Report my Signal -Blogs" nor the individual authors of any material on these Blogs accept responsibility for any loss or damage caused (including through negligence), which anyone may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of use of or reliance on information contained in or accessed through these Blogs.
This is not an official Blog site. This forum is run by team of ex- Corps of Signals, Indian Army, Veterans for social networking of Indian Defence Veterans. It is not affiliated to or officially recognized by the MoD or the AHQ, Director General of Signals or Government/ State.
The Report My Signal Forum will endeavor to edit/ delete any material which is considered offensive, undesirable and or impinging on national security. The Blog Team is very conscious of potentially questionable content. However, where a content is posted and between posting and removal from the blog in such cases, the act does not reflect either the condoning or endorsing of said material by the Team.
Blog Moderator: Lt Col James Kanagaraj (Retd)

Resources