Date: Tuesday, 23 March, 2010, 6:25 AM
Dear Colleagues,
The IESM continues to describe OROP as equal rank, equal length of service, equal pension. There has been some view circulated where service in last rank is suggested as the criterion. This has been voiced many times in the past and has some merit. However, it also has an implication. An illustration may be relevant.
The select promotions for officers in our Army are not uniform for all Arms and Services. I recall in mid Seventies our BM (An Arty officer who rose to become Army Commander) was senior in service to all the three Infantry COs. Yet he was a Major because promotions in the Infantry were much faster than in Arty. Hypothetically speaking, if they were all to retire as Lt Cols, the Arty officer would have spent much shorter time in the rank of Lt Col and if service in the rank held were the criterion for OROP, he would stand to lose for no fault of his.
It also needs to be noted that the differing connotation is only applicable to officers since we all retire by age. It has no relevance to JCOs and Other Ranks who form the vast majority of pensioners; they all retire by length of service.
The definition chosen by IESM for pursuit of OROP is not perfect, as no definition would be. But it has more universal applicability. We should not change simply because it is presumed to be more difficult to implement.
Best regards,
Lt Gen (Emeritus) Raj Kadyan, PVSM, AVSM, VSM,
Chairman IESM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Disclaimer
The contents posted on these Blogs are personal reflections of the Bloggers and do not reflect the views of the "Report My Signal- Blog" Team.
Neither the "Report my Signal -Blogs" nor the individual authors of any material on these Blogs accept responsibility for any loss or damage caused (including through negligence), which anyone may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of use of or reliance on information contained in or accessed through these Blogs.
This is not an official Blog site. This forum is run by team of ex- Corps of Signals, Indian Army, Veterans for social networking of Indian Defence Veterans. It is not affiliated to or officially recognized by the MoD or the AHQ, Director General of Signals or Government/ State.
The Report My Signal Forum will endeavor to edit/ delete any material which is considered offensive, undesirable and or impinging on national security. The Blog Team is very conscious of potentially questionable content. However, where a content is posted and between posting and removal from the blog in such cases, the act does not reflect either the condoning or endorsing of said material by the Team.
Blog Moderator: Lt Col James Kanagaraj (Retd)
Neither the "Report my Signal -Blogs" nor the individual authors of any material on these Blogs accept responsibility for any loss or damage caused (including through negligence), which anyone may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of use of or reliance on information contained in or accessed through these Blogs.
This is not an official Blog site. This forum is run by team of ex- Corps of Signals, Indian Army, Veterans for social networking of Indian Defence Veterans. It is not affiliated to or officially recognized by the MoD or the AHQ, Director General of Signals or Government/ State.
The Report My Signal Forum will endeavor to edit/ delete any material which is considered offensive, undesirable and or impinging on national security. The Blog Team is very conscious of potentially questionable content. However, where a content is posted and between posting and removal from the blog in such cases, the act does not reflect either the condoning or endorsing of said material by the Team.
Blog Moderator: Lt Col James Kanagaraj (Retd)
No comments:
Post a Comment